🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.